What are the two components that evidence-based practice integrates?

The correct response highlights the integration of client perspectives and external scientific evidence, which are fundamental components of evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare and communication disorders.

Client perspectives refer to the individual needs, values, and preferences of the person receiving care, which are crucial for making informed and effective interventions. This component ensures that treatment is tailored to the unique circumstances and desired outcomes of the client.

External scientific evidence encompasses research findings derived from rigorous studies that have been conducted in the field. This includes systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and other high-quality research that provides objective data on the efficacy and effectiveness of various interventions.

By combining these two elements—client perspectives and external scientific evidence—professionals can provide care that is not only grounded in solid research but also respects and prioritizes the individual client's context and preferences. This integrative approach helps ensure that practices are both scientifically valid and relevant to those being served, leading to improved outcomes in communication disorders.

The other choices do not effectively encompass the complete framework of evidence-based practice as defined in the field, as they do not integrate both critical aspects of client involvement and scientific rigor.